Reform Marijuana Laws NORML Site Map Contact Us About Marijuana Law Reform Media Contact About Marijuana Law Reform Home
Working to reform marijuana laws
search by
Click here to navigate by map
State Laws | Leyes Estatales
 
 
 
 
 
Get NORML's eZine
Legislative Alerts, News & Analysis from NORML

Details & Privacy


Get NORML's eZine
Meet Others, Share Stories
 

Home > News Archive > 2006 > Congress Considers Legislation To Ban Drug Test Aids

Congress Considers Legislation To Ban Drug Test Aids

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter Check our RSS Feeds

March 16, 2006 - Washington, DC, USA

Washington, DC: Members of Congress introduced legislation this week to prohibit the manufacture and sale of commercial products intended to influence drug test results, such as diuretic teas and chemical adulterants.

House Bill 4910, the "Drug Testing Integrity Act," calls on the Consumer Product Safety Commission to define these items as "banned hazardous products" under federal law. The bill now awaits action by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

House Bill 4910 is the second proposal to be introduced in Congress since members held hearings last May vowing to bar the sale of any commercial products designed to influence drug testing results.

Of the estimated 55 million drug tests performed annually, approximately 90 percent of those are urine tests, which may be influenced by dilution or adding an adulterant to the sample. To date, fourteen states have enacted laws prohibiting the commercial sale of such products.

While often referred to as an impairment test, urinalysis cannot detect the presence of parent drugs, and only indicates that a particular substance may have been previously consumed at some unspecified point in time. In the case of cannabis, non-psychoactive marijuana metabolites (compounds produced from chemical changes of a drug in the body) may be detectable in urine for days or even weeks after past use. As a result, the US Department of Justice affirms that a positive urine test, even when confirmed, "does not indicate ... recency, frequency, or amount of [drug] use; or impairment."

Responding to the introduction of HB 4910, NORML Executive Director Allen St. Pierre said, "It's ironic that Congress is trying to quash legitimate businesses that have successfully emerged in the free market -- particularly when the market for this industry is a direct result of politicians' zeal to intrusively search the bodily fluids of tens of millions of law abiding Americans without cause."

For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, or Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at (202) 483-5500.

    updated: Mar 16, 2006

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter Check our RSS Feeds

2009   2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998   1997   1996  
Country State/Prov Year Month
Help NORML Fight Unfair Laws
Features
Features
   
NORML
Site MapContact UsSupport NORMLTake ActionLibrary
© 2009 NORML • Privacy StatementSite Terms • Site by Communicopia and Red Aphid
NORML and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832
Tel: (202) 483-5500 • Fax: (202) 483-0057 • Email: norml@norml.org